Prof. Lennard Funk’s Education Portal

Call: 01625 545071
Email: [email protected]
For treatment enquires visit The Arm Clinic

Biomechanical Analysis of Different Operative Techniques with complete ACJ disruption

Authors: Krenn

References: Osteo Trauma Care 2005 – 154 – 159

The goal of this study was to evaluate three different operative techniques for acromioclavicular joint
fixation: trans-articular K-wire fixation; ligament reconstruction along with a synthetic augmentation
device (LARS); and coracoclavicular Bosworth screw. Mechanical properties were tested in a cadaver
study in order to determine the primary mechanical stability during repetitive passive motions. Eighteen
fresh cadavers were used to test a cyclic load (50,000 cycles). Secondary joint dislocation and the rate
of implant loosening were monitored by standard AP stress X-ray. Metal markers in the coracoid, the
acromion and the lateral clavicle were used to measure the acromioclavicular distance increase (Δ-AC)
and the coracoclavicular distance increase (-CC). The range of motion was set on 30° - 90° of abduction
for the first 25,000 cycles and then was raised to 60° - 120°.

The least amount of vertical dislocation was seen in the K-wire and the LARS group (mean Δ-CC 0.3mm;
range: 0 - 13mm and 1.5mm; range 0 - 67mm, respectively). The Bosworth group showed significantly
higher dislocation rates (4.2mm; range 2.3 - 7.1mm; p - 0.005). This was true especially when the
abduction range was extended to a maximum of 120°. The rate of implant loosening in the K-wire group
was higher than that in the other two groups. This study shows that the LARS procedure and the K-wires
technique give equal results concerning stability after repetitive passive motion but with a high rate of
implant loosening in the K-wire group. According to our findings, abduction should be limited to 90° after
implanting a Bosworth screw in order to prevent loosening or failure of the hardware.


Find a Shoulder Professional

+ Add Your Clinic Advanced Search

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here. satisfies the INTUTE criteria for quality and has been awarded 'editor's choice'.

The material on this website is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between ourselves and our patients. Full Disclaimer