Prof. Lennard Funk’s Education Portal

Call: 01625 545071
Email: [email protected]
For treatment enquires visit The Arm Clinic

Functional analysis of shoulder arthrodesis.

Authors: Ladislav Nagy, MD, Peter P. Koch, MD, Christian Gerber, MD

References: J Shoulder Elbow Surg 2004 Jul-Aug;13(4):386-95

Abstract
The goal of this study was to determine the optimal position of shoulder arthrodesis for functional outcome and pain. Twenty patients who had undergone shoulder arthrodesis were interviewed and examined clinically and with standard radiographs. In addition, computed tomography (CT) scans were used to determine the exact position of the humerus relative to the scapula in all three planes. The average position observed was 14° of flexion (humerus to longitudinal body axis), 55° of abduction (humerus to lateral scapular border), and 23° of internal rotation (forearm to sagittal body plane). Clinical evaluation showed functional advantages for tasks above waist level with increasing flexion but at the cost of more pain. Increasing abduction improved upper limb function above waist level but compromised complex movements below waist level. Higher degrees of abduction tended to improve the result expressed by the overall score and furnished better pain relief. Higher degrees of internal rotation resulted in improved function below waist level but also in more pain. Our results show that there is no single optimal position but suggest that a clinically estimated position of 15° to 30° of flexion, 35° to 45° of abduction, and 30° to 40° of internal rotation is desirable. This corresponds to CT-measured angles of 15° to 30° for flexion, 55° to 65° for abduction, and 0° of internal rotation (humeral epicondylar axis to scapular plane).

Search ShoulderDoc.co.uk

Find a Shoulder Professional

+ Add Your Clinic Advanced Search

This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here.

ShoulderDoc.co.uk satisfies the INTUTE criteria for quality and has been awarded 'editor's choice'.

The material on this website is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between ourselves and our patients. Full Disclaimer