Clinical and Radiological Outcomes of Acromio-clavicular Joint Reconstructions with the LARS Ligament

Authors: P Wright & L Funk

References: European Society of Shoulder and Elbow Surgery. Lyon. 2011

Purpose: To assess the clinical and radiological outcome of reconstruction of injuries to the acromioclavicular joint (ACJ) with the LARS ligament.

Methods: Patients who had undergone a LARS ligament reconstruction of the ACJ were identified retrospectively. Clinical outcomes were measured pre- and post-operatively using the Oxford and Constant scoring systems. Patient satisfaction was recorded on a scale of one to ten. Radiographs were reviewed and displacement at the ACJ was measured as a percentage of the ACJ height.

Results:  55 patients were included in the study, with a mean age of 36 years. 8 patients were professional athletes participating in contact sports. According to Rockwoods classification there were 29 type III, 5 type IV and 19 type V injuries. 12 patients were treated within 4 weeks of injury, for those with chronic injuries the mean time to treatment was 7 months. 8 patients were revised for failure of previous ACJ reconstruction. The mean length of follow-up was 15 months (range 2-39).
Postoperatively the mean Oxford score improved from 25 to 43 and the mean Constant score improved from 45 to 93. The mean patient satisfaction score was 90%. The median postoperative residual displacement of the ACJ was 15%. In one patient who did not follow the prescribed rehabilitation protocol the reconstruction failed in the early postoperative period.

Conclusion:  Reconstruction of the ACJ using the LARS ligament produces reliable and predictable improvement in pain and function in the short to mid-term following acute or chronic injuries. Radiological outcomes are less predictable but do not preclude a successful clinical result.

More articles on LARS Ligament


This website is certified by Health On the Net Foundation. Click to verify. This site complies with the HONcode standard for trustworthy health information:
verify here. satisfies the INTUTE criteria for quality and has been awarded 'editor's choice'.

The material on this website is designed to support, not replace, the relationship that exists between ourselves and our patients. Full Disclaimer